The coronavirus pandemic has forced all Australians to reevaluate how we live our lives.
Offices are shut, lockdowns are in place and people are now working at home more than ever.
Gone are the days where our ‘home’ was simply the place we rest our heads and enjoy some down time between work and our social lives – the coronavirus social distancing has put an end to life as we once knew it.
If social distancing and the Covid-19 environment has taught us anything, it has taught us the importance of the neighbourhood we live in.
If you can leave your home and be in walking distance of, or a short trip to, a great shopping strip, your favourite coffee shop, amenities, the beach, a great park, the recently implemented coronavirus restrictions might seem a little more palatable than if you had none of that on your doorstep.
Why is neighbourhood so important?
In short, it’s all to do with capital growth, and we all know capital growth is critical for investment success, or just to create more stored wealth in the value of your home.
Sure there is always the opportunity to add value through renovating your property or making a quick buck when buying well.
But these are one off’s and won’t make a long term difference if your property is not in the right locartion because you can’t change its location.
This is key, because we know that 80% of a property’s performance is dependent on the location and its neighbourhood.
In fact, some locations have even outperformed others by 50-100% over the past decade.
And it’s likely that moving forward, thanks to the current environment, people will place a greater emphasis on neighbourhood and inner and middle-ring suburbs where more affluent occupants and tenants will be living.
These ‘livable’ neighbourhoods with close amenities is where capital growth will outperform.
What makes a ‘good’ neighbourhood?
A good neighbourhood means different things to different people, but there are some key factors which help to determine which locations have the potential to grow in value faster in the future.
Generally, a good neighbourhood is determined on the physical location, suburb character and its close proximity to amenities such as a shopping strip, park, coffee shops, education, and even some jobs.
It’s obvious then that in our new ‘Covid’ world, people will want to be in a location where everything they need is in a short 20-minute proximity – whether that is on public transport, bike ride or walk – to their home.
In planning circles this concept is known as the ‘20-minute neighbourhood’.
Many inner suburbs of Australia’s capital cities and parts of their middle suburbs already meet the 20-minute neighbourhood tests, but very few outer suburbs do because there is a lower developmental density, less diversity in its community and less access to public transport.
The key criteria for a ‘good’ neighbourhood
Here is a list of 7 primary neighbourhood factors which have the potential to drive up property prices:
1. Close proximity to public transport
Neighbourhoods with properties that are within walking distance to public transport, such as the train, bus, ferry, or light rail, are popular with buyers and therefore are likely to add value over the longer term.
2. Close proximity to schools
Some buyers will pay a premium to be in the catchment area for particular schools and as such, high demand generally means higher property price points.
3. Accessible amenities
As we have previously discussed, a neighbourhood with all the local amenities you could want – parks, shops, restaurants, cafes, gyms, the beach, etc. – would fetch a premium price for its local properties.
4. A low crime rate
It goes without saying that a property in a neighbourhood with a low crime rate will be more valuable than one with a high crime rate.
5. It’s well maintained
Neighbourhoods and homes which are well maintained and clean indicate a level of community care that can help add value to properties in the local area.
6. Planned upgrades which are beneficial
Neighbourhoods with planned upgrades could be beneficial or detrimental to property prices in the area.
For example, improved public transport and any plans to make the neighbourhood more visually attractive (improvement to the appearance of buildings or footpaths for example) could increase property prices.
7. Any historic charm
Historic charm brings a unique character to a neighbourhood that is often in demand by buyers and in the long term buyer demand for this type of area has the potential to translate to higher property prices going forward.
It’s all about the neighbourhood
Neighbourhood has always been a key factor to consider when buying an investment property, and now it’s even more important.
Not only do we already know that location does the heavy lifting when it comes to capital growth, with some areas fetching 50-100% greater capital growth than other locations, we’re also in unprecedented times which has forced us to adapt to a new normal.
This is a new normal where restrictions are put in place on our movement, social distancing has been implemented and your home now doubles as your office.
This is shining a spotlight on the neighbourhood we live in and what we have available at our fingertips.
As the world around us evolves and adapts, homeowners and investors must do the same and view properties with a post-pandemic eye.
Looking at the bigger picture remains key to your success as a property investor and now, whether you’re looking for a new home or to add to your investment portfolio, the right neighbourhood is absolutely crucial to success.
-Now is the time to take action and set yourself for the opportunities that will present themselves as the market moves on
A perfect storm is brewing for our property markets in 2021-22, and you can trust the team at Metropole to provide you with direction, guidance and results.
In challenging times like we are currently experiencing you need an advisor who takes a holistic approach to your wealth creation and that’s what you exactly what you get from the multi award-winning team at Metropole.
If you’re looking at buying your next home or investment property here’s 4 ways we can help you:
- Strategic property advice. – Allow us to build a Strategic Property Plan for you and your family. Planning is bringing the future into the present so you can do something about it now! This will give you direction, results and more certainty. Click here to learn more
- Buyer’s agency – As Australia’s most trusted buyers’ agents we’ve been involved in over $3Billion worth of transactions creating wealth for our clients and we can do the same for you. Our on the ground teams in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane bring you years of experience and perspective – that’s something money just can’t buy. We’ll help you find your next home or an investment-grade property. Click here to learn how we can help you.
- Wealth Advisory – We can provide you with strategic tailored financial planning and wealth advice. Click here to learn more about we can help you.
- Property Management – Our stress-free property management services help you maximize your property returns. Click here to find out why our clients enjoy a vacancy rate considerably below the market average, our tenants stay an average of 3 years, and our properties lease 10 days faster than the market average.
The post “Why neighbourhood has never been so important when buying property” by Michael Yardney appeared first on the propertyupdate.com.au Blog
This is how long it takes Brisbane first-home buyers to save for a house
Brisbane first-home buyers have bucked a nationwide trend. They are now taking less time to save for a deposit, with closed borders, government grants and a softening of entry-level house prices launching locals onto the property ladder faster than a year ago.
Despite the city’s soaring property market recently pushing median house prices to record heights, new data from Domain’s First-Home Buyer Report, released on Monday, revealed it now takes the average couple four years and two months to save a 20 per cent house deposit – which is four months less than this time last year.
Brisbane was the only capital city to see savings time slashed over the 12-month period, with Sydneysiders forced to tack an extra six months onto their already painfully slow savings haul – which is now seven years and one month for the average couple.
Domain senior research analyst Nicola Powell said the data revealed just how sunny the market remains in the Queensland capital – with grants and wage growth easing the squeeze for first-home buyers alongside COVID, which had worked wonders for savvy savers.
“Brisbane bucks the trend really in terms of what we’re seeing across our other cities, and while it doesn’t have the quickest time to save, it’s seen more favourable conditions over the past year,” Dr Powell said.
“It was the only city to see a decline in time for houses while for units it remained stable … and what we’ve also seen is tax cuts and compounding interest on savings have helped speed up that time.
“I think over the past 12 months, we’ve all saved more, and for first-home buyers, it has supercharged their savings pot … the pandemic has also really unlocked an element of affordability. For those first-home buyers who can work from home, they are able to now seek different locations to reside, which opens the door to affordability.”
Stamp duty v land tax: the pros and cons explained
Housing affordability continues to be a hot topic and the often-raised suggestion of replacing stamp duty on the sale of a property with a universal land tax is back on the table again.
The idea has been around for more than a decade after former Treasury secretary Ken Henry claimed that stamp duty not only is a disincentive for people to move, but also gives state governments erratic income – their coffers overflow when the property market is booming but withers away when the market slumps.
The NSW government is dusting off the idea again by commissioning a consultation paper and inviting interested parties to provide their views until July 30.
The proposal envisages that a homebuyer could either opt to pay stamp duty on a property purchase price, or an annual land tax that would be based on a property land value that would then be attached to it forever. In other words, once a purchaser opted for the annual land tax option in lieu of stamp duty, there would be no going back.
In the event of the scheme proving popular, the paper envisages a price threshold based on the value of the property. If that was the case, a buyer of a $5 million property could still be liable for stamp duty on its purchase and could not opt to pay land tax instead.
State governments receive more than $20 billion a year from stamp duty, so any introduction of a new scheme would need to be phased in.
The proposal floats the possibility of the amount of stamp duty forgone being capped at, say, $2 billion a year in the early years, with the cap changing over time as the number of people opting out of stamp duty increases.
Proponents of the scheme claim that the property market would boom because buyers could use the extra money now required for stamp duty to increase their home deposits and qualify for bigger mortgages. However, this begs the question, do we really want to encourage homebuyers to take out even bigger loans? After all, interest rates are at rock bottom and must rise in the future.
If you think mortgage stress is bad now, imagine what a 2 percentage point rise in mortgage interest rates would do.
The biggest problem with a tax based on land values is that, in many states, it is common practice to leave the rate of land tax unindexed, which means that each time a property increases in value, the land tax bill increases, too.
A homeowner who chose the land tax option would most likely be faced with an increasing land tax burden as the years passed. This could be particularly hard on retirees, who could see their home costs increase while their capital decreases.
Another major flaw in the proposal is that it would likely provide a “free kick” for property speculators. It is generally accepted that speculators competing with regular homebuyers has been a major reason for property prices soaring to record highs.
In NSW, a person who buys a property today for $800,000 would pay stamp duty of $31,335, irrespective of whether or not it is their primary residence. This large upfront cost is a major disincentive for speculators who want to buy property now and quickly flip it.
However, speculators may have a field day if they could choose an annual land tax bill instead of stamp duty. If they held the property for only a short time, there may be no land tax at all payable.
There is a further complication with the land tax proposal.
Investors already pay land tax on rental properties and this cost is usually passed on to their tenants.
It would be manifestly unfair if stamp duty – which is a capital cost, not a deduction – was waived on property purchases for investors, while continuing to allow them to claim a tax deduction for the land tax, which had already indirectly been passed on to tenants.
The land tax proposal is merely in the consultation stage. Let’s hope there are further deep discussions of all the pros and cons to avoid any potential property market disasters.
Article Source: www.brisbanetimes.com.au
Return of property investors raises questions for regulators
It is becoming clearer that the window for large numbers of first home-buyers to scramble into the property market is fast closing, with investors and speculators chasing big capital gains returning.
With the house price boom showing few signs of cooling, this baton-pass should ensure an ongoing and lively debate about whether it is time for regulators to place restrictions on mortgage lending.
Earlier this year, first-home buyers were flooding into the property market in numbers not seen since 2009, attracted by generous taxpayer incentives and record-low interest rates. Sadly, the first-home-buyer party appears to have been short-lived. New lending to this group has fallen for three months in a row, no doubt partly in response to the explosion in prices.
Meanwhile, investors are flooding back into the market, with their share of new lending rising from 23 per cent to 26 per cent. New investor commitments in April were at their highest level since 2017, when we were in another property boom.
Importantly, investors’ share of the market is still well below the sky-high 46 per cent of new lending reached in 2015, and below its long-term average of about 35 per cent. However, the harsh financial realities of this property market suggests that this trend still has a lot further to run.
For one, CoreLogic analyst Tim Lawless says first-home buyers tend to be the most sensitive to rising prices, especially when it comes to scraping together enough cash for a deposit.
Investors, on the other hand, typically have better access to funding because they can borrow against their owner-occupied residence, or other property investments. They also often have higher incomes, and Lawless says they’ll probably become more active in the market chasing capital gains.
So far, banks say there are only early signs that investors’ interest is stirring, and owner-occupiers are still overwhelmingly driving the market. That is one reason regulators have pushed back against imposing credit restrictions so far. But with the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) saying it expects to keep official interest rates at just 0.1 per cent until at least 2024, more house price growth looks likely.
If there is a further significant rebound in investor lending accompanied by related property price surges, it could force regulators to think more carefully about introducing housing credit curbs.
Why? The RBA has made it clear that an investor-driven market has distinct risks.
In 2015, the central bank said that when house prices were being fuelled by “speculative demand” from investors chasing big capital gains, it tends to “amplify” the run-up in prices, while potentially raising the risk of bigger property price falls in the future.
To be clear, we are not in a 2015-style investor housing boom today. However, interest rates are much lower and asset prices everywhere are rising, suggesting these risks are as relevant as ever.
Politicians might also find it more challenging to allow the market to continue its red-hot run if investors start playing a bigger role, while first-home buyers dwindle.
So far, the financial regulators have argued they are not responsible for house prices and will only act if the banks erode their lending standards. That does not appear to be happening, suggesting credit curbs are not imminent.
Even so, the growing signs of investors coming back to the market, as first home buyers head for the exits, is an important shift the authorities will be watching closely.
Article Source: www.brisbanetimes.com.au
Property Management6 years ago
7 Common GST Mistakes On Property
Residential5 years ago
Ipswich Proves Frontier In Affordable Housing
Infrastructure3 years ago
Decision on horizon for key marina section of huge North Harbour development at Burpengary
Market Place3 years ago
How to make $1 million ‘flipping’ houses
Market Place3 years ago
Moreton Bay makes top 10 list of places to invest in property
Infrastructure2 years ago
Watch: Route of Gold Coast’s new ‘M2’ motorway revealed [video]
Market Place3 years ago
Affordable acreage suburbs within 20km of the Brisbane CBD
Developments3 years ago
Brisbane and interstate investors drawn to up-and-coming King Street precinct